Related dynamics of magnetic vortexes in five-layer spintransfer nanooscillator

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The influence of spin-polarized current and the number of magnetic layers on the coupled dynamics of vortices in small-diameter spin-transfer nanooscillators has been studied. Using the software package for micromagnetic modeling SpinPM, the dependence of the frequency on the current magnitude of the currents at which a stationary mode of coupled oscillations of three vortices is observed is found. For the case of three identical magnetic layers, the possibility of implementing different scenarios of coupled vortex dynamics is shown. It was found that numerical calculations for the case of three magnetic layers yield frequencies of stationary coupled oscillations that are lower than those predicted by theory. Built on effective equations for the coordinates of the vortex center.

Sobre autores

E. Ekomasov

Ufa University of Science and Technology

Email: georgij.antonow@yandex.ru
Rússia, st. Zaki Validi, 32, Ufa, 450076

D. Neradovsky

Tyumen State University

Email: georgij.antonow@yandex.ru
Rússia, st. Volodarskogo, 6, Tyumen, 625003

G. Antonov

Ufa University of Science and Technology

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: georgij.antonow@yandex.ru
Rússia, st. Zaki Validi, 32, Ufa, 450076

V. Filippova

Ufa University of Science and Technology

Email: georgij.antonow@yandex.ru
Rússia, st. Zaki Validi, 32, Ufa, 450076

Bibliografia

  1. Звездин К.А., Екомасов Е.Г. // ФММ. 2022. Т. 123. № 3. С. 219.
  2. Wu J., Carlton D., Park J., Meng Y. // Nature Phys. 2011. V. 7. P. 303. doi: 10.1038/nphys1891.
  3. Mironov V.L., Gribkov B.A., Fraerman A.A. et al. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007. V. 312. P. 153. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.09.032.
  4. Guslienko K. Yu., Han X.F., Keavney D.J. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006. V. 96. № 6. P. 067205. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.067205.
  5. Bohlens S., Krüger B., Drews A., Bolte M. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008. V. 93. № 14. P. 142508. doi: 10.1063/1.2998584 6.
  6. Nakano K., Chiba D., Ohshima N. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011. V. 99. № 26. P. 262505. doi: 10.1063/1.3673303 56.
  7. Grollier J., Querlioz D., Camsari K.Y. et al. // Neuromorphic Spintronics. Nat Electron. 2020. V. 3. P. 360. doi: 10.1038/s41928-019-0360-9.
  8. Звездин А.К., Хвальковский А.В., Звездин К.А. // Успехи физ. наук. 2008. Т. 178. № 4. C. 436. doi: 10.1070/PU2008v051n04ABEH006508.
  9. Dussaux A., Georges B., Grollier J. et al. // Nature Commun. 2010. V. 1. P. 8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1006
  10. Khvalkovskiy A.V., Grollier J., Dussaux A. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2009. V. 80. № 14. P. 140401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.140401.
  11. Gaididei Y., Kravchuk V., Sheka D. // Int. J. Quantum Chemistry. 2010. V. 110. P. 8397. doi: 10.1002/qua.22253.
  12. Ivanov B.A., Zaspel E. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007. V. 99. № 24. P. 247208. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.247208.
  13. Усов Н.А., Песчаный С.Е. // ФММ. 1994. Т. 78. № 6. С. 13.
  14. Guslienko K. Yu., Buchanan K.S., Bader S.D., Novosad V. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005. V. 86. № 22. P. 223112. doi: 10.1063/1.1929078.
  15. Locatelli N., Naletov V.V., Grollier J. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011. V. 98. № 6. P. 062501. doi: 10.1063/1.3553771.
  16. Cherepov S.S., Koop B.C., Galkin A.Y. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012. V. 109. № 9. P. 097204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.139902.
  17. Locatelli N., Ekomasov A.E., Khvalkovskiy A.V. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013. V. 102. № 6. P. 062401. doi: 10.1063/1.4790841
  18. Sluka V., Kakay A., Deac A.M. et al. // Nat. Commun. 2015. V. 6. P. 6409. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7409.
  19. Locatelli N., Lebrun R., Naletov V. et al. // IEEE Trans. 2015. V. MAG-51. № 8. Article No. 4300206. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2015.2414903.
  20. Holmgren E., Bondarenko A., Ivanov B.A., Korenivski V. // Phys. Rev. B. 2018. V. 97. № 9. P. 094406. doi: 10.1103/Phys. rev.B.97.094406.
  21. Anam Hanif, Arbab Abdur Rahim, Husnul Maab // Physica B: Cond. Matt. 2023. V. 668. ArticleNo. 415203. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2023.415203.
  22. Екомасов А.Е., Степанов С.В., Звездин К.А., Екомасов Е.Г.//ФММ. 2017. Т. 118. № 4. С. 345. doi: 10.7868/S0015323017020024
  23. Степанов С.В., Екомасов А.Е., Звездин К.А., Екомасов Е.Г.//ФТТ. 2018. Т. 60. № 6. С. 1045.
  24. doi: 10.21883/FTT.2018.06.45974.22M
  25. Ekomasov A.E., Stepanov S.V., Zvezdin K.A., Ekomasov E.G. // J. Magn. Magn.Mater. 2019. V. 471. P. 513. DOI: org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.09.077.
  26. Екомасов Е.Г., Степанов С.В., Назаров и др.// Письма в ЖТФ. 2021. Т. 47. № 17. С. 26.
  27. Stepanov S.V., Nazarov V.N., Zvezdin K.A., Ekomasov E.G. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2022. V. 562. P. 169758. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169758.
  28. Lacoste B., Marins de Castro M., Devolder T. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2014. V. 90. № 22. P. 224404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224404.
  29. Zaspel C.E., Galkina E.G., Ivanov B.A. // Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019. V. 12. № 4. P. 044019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.044019.
  30. Chun-Yeol You // J. Magnetics. 2012. V. 17. P. 73. doi: 10.4283/jmag.2012.17.2.073.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024