Crystallization at "Soft" Chemistry Conditions of New Inorganic Fluoride Nanomaterials and Their Application Prospects

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Peculiarities of formation and growth of crystals of metal fluorides MF2 (where M — Ca, Sr, Pb) and MF3 (where M — Sc, La, Ln) as a result of interaction between components of an aqueous solution of metal salt and gaseous hydrogen fluoride at planar interface at room temperature are considered. Compounds with different crystal structures: PbF2 (pr. gr. Pnma, Fm3m), ScF3 (pr. gr. Pm3m, P6/mmm), LaF3 (pr. gr. P3c1) were chosen as model objects. The factors that have a significant influence on the morphology, size, and ordering of the formed crystals have been determined. The possibility of synthesis of 1D and 2D crystals is shown for some compounds. Probable fields of application of nanomaterials based on synthesized compounds are analyzed. The conclusion is made about the possibility of the interface technique developing for the design of new solid electrolytes, optically active materials, and functional coatings.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

L. Gulina

Saint Petersburg State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: l.gulina@spbu.ru
Rússia, Saint Petersburg

V. Tolstoy

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: l.gulina@spbu.ru
Rússia, Saint Petersburg

I. Murin

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: l.gulina@spbu.ru
Rússia, Saint Petersburg

Bibliografia

  1. Gránásy L., Pusztai T., Börzsönyi T. et al. // Nat. Mater. 2004. V. 3. № 9. P. 645. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1190
  2. Linnikov O.D. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2014. V. 83. № 4. P. 343. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2014v083n04ABEH004399
  3. Ivanov V.K., Fedorov P.P., Baranchikov A. et al. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2014. V. 83. № 12. P. 1204. https://doi.org/10.1070/RCR4453
  4. Lv W., Huo W., Niu Y. et al. // CrystEngComm. 2015. V. 17. № 4. P. 729. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ce01640h
  5. Zhou W. // Crystals. 2019. V. 9. № 1. P. 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9010007
  6. Kim H.J., Kim J.H., Jeong J.S. et al. // Nano Letters. 2022. V. 22. № 8. P. 3252. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04966
  7. Han T., Choi Y., Kwon J.T. et al. // Langmuir. 2020. V. 36. № 33. P. 9843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01468
  8. Khodaparast S., Marcos J., Sharratt W.N. et al. // Langmuir. 2021. V. 37. № 1. P. 230. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02821
  9. Pikin S.A. // Phys. A. Stat. Mech. Appl. 1992. V. 191. № 1–4. P. 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(92)90518-U
  10. Buchinskaya I., Fedorov P. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2004. V. 73. P. 404. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2004v073n04ABEH000811
  11. Иванов-Шиц А.К., Мурин И.В. Ионика твердого тела: в 2 т., т. 2. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2010. 1000 с.
  12. Trnovcová V., Fedorov P.P., Furár I. // J. Rare Earths. 2008. V. 26. № 2. P. 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0721(08)60070-8
  13. Trnovcová V., Fedorov P.P., Furár I. // Russ. J. Electrochem. 2009. V. 45. № 6. P. 630. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193509060020
  14. Trnovcová V., Fedorov P.P., Buchinskaya I.I. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 1999. V. 119. № 1–4. P. 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(98)00501-3
  15. Sorokin N.I., Fedorov P.P., Sobolev B.P. // Inorg. Mater. 1997. V. 33. № 1. P. 1.
  16. Hu L., Chen J., Fan L. et al. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014. V. 97. № 4. P. 1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12855
  17. Александров А.А., Брагина А.Г., Сорокин Н.И. и др. // Неорган. материалы. 2023. Т. 59. № 3. С. 306. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002337X23030016
  18. Fedorov P.P., Alexandrov A.A. // J. Fluorine Chem. 2019. V. 227. P. 109374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2019.109374
  19. Glazunova T., Boltalin A., Fedorov P. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006. V. 51. P. 983. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023606070011
  20. Liu G., Zhou Z., Fei F. et al. // Phys. B (Amsterdam, Neth.). 2015. V. 457. P. 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2014.10.004
  21. Han L., Wang Y., Guo L. et al. // Nanoscale. 2014. V. 6. № 11. P. 5907. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR00512K
  22. Schmidt L., Emmerling F., Kirmse H. et al. // RSC Adv. 2014. V. 4. № 1. P. 32. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA43769H
  23. Fujihara S., Kadota Y., Kimura T. // J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2002. V. 24. № 2. P. 147. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015252010509
  24. Heise M., Scholz G., Kemnitz E. // Solid State Sci. 2017. V. 72. P. 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2017.08.010
  25. Heise M., Scholz G., Duevel A. et al. // Solid State Sci. 2018. V. 77. P. 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2018.01.007
  26. Ji Q., Melnikova N.A., Glumov O.V. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2023. V. 49. № 11. P. 16901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.02.051
  27. Zheng Y., Zhang Y., Wu J. et al. // Displays. 2014. V. 35. № 5. P. 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2014.10.002
  28. Han Y., Zhang Q., Fang S. et al. // Adv. Mater. Res. 2011. V. 335–336. P. 172. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.335-336.172
  29. Kuznetsov S.V., Osiko V.V., Tkatchenko E.A. et al. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2006. V. 75. № 12. P. 1065. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2006v075n12ABEH003637
  30. Abiev R.S., Zdravkov A.V., Kudryashova Y.S. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 7. P. 1047. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621070020
  31. Fedorov P.P., Luginina A.A., Tabachkova N.Y. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 8. P. 1211. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622080101
  32. Fedorov P.P., Kuznetsov S.V., Mayakova M.N. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011. V. 56. № 10. P. 1525. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602361110007X
  33. Mayakova M.N., Kuznetsov S.V., Voronov V.V. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014. V. 59. № 7. P. 773. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602361407016X
  34. Patle A., Patil R.R., Moharil S.V. // AIP Conf. Proc. 2016. V. 1728. № 1. P. 020353. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4946404
  35. Zhou Z., Li W., Song J. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2018. V. 44. № 4. P. 4344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.028
  36. Kuznetsov S.V., Kozlova A.N., Voronov V.V. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018. V. 63. № 3. P. 293. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023618030130
  37. Fedorov P.P., Mayakova M.N., Kuznetsov S.V. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017. V. 62. № 9. P. 1173. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023617090078
  38. Luginina A.A., Fedorov P.P., Kuznetsov S.V. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2012. V. 48. № 5. P. 531. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002016851205010X
  39. Yasyrkina D.S., Kuznetsov S.V., Alexandrov A.A. et al. // Nanosyst. Phys. Chem. Math. 2021. V. 12. № 4. P. 505. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2021-12-4-505-511
  40. Kuznetsov S.V., Nizamutdinov A.S., Proydakova V.Y. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2019. V. 55. № 10. P. 1031. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002016851910008X
  41. Fedorov P.P., Luginina A.A., Ermakova J.A. et al. // J. Fluorine Chem. 2017. V. 194. P. 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2016.12.003
  42. Бучинская И.И., Сорокин Н.И. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2023. Т. 68. № 7. С. 877. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X23600044
  43. Kuznetsov S.V., Ovsyannikova A.A., Tupitsyna E.A. et al. // J. Fluorine Chem. 2014. V. 161. P. 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2014.02.011
  44. Gulina L.B., Weigler M., Privalov A.F. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2020. V. 352. P. 115354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2020.115354
  45. Fedorov P.P., Osiko V.V., Kuznetsov S.V. et al. // J. Cryst. Growth. 2014. V. 401. P. 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.12.069
  46. Tolstoi V.P., Gulina L.B. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2013. V. 83. № 9. P. 1635. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363213090016
  47. Tolstoy V.P., Gulina L.B. // J. Nano- Electron. Phys. 2013. V. 5. № 1. P. 01003.
  48. Gulina L.B., Tolstoy V.P., Solovev A.A. et al. // Prog. Nat. Sci. 2020. V. 30. № 3. P. 279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2020.05.001
  49. Гулина Л.Б. Синтез твердофазных соединений и наноматериалов с участием химических реакций на границе раздела раствор–газ. Автореф. дис. ... д.х.н.: 1.4.15. СПб, 2022. 38 c.
  50. Forsyth J.B., Wilson C.C., Sabine T.M. // Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A. 1989. V. 45. № 3. P. 244. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767388011353
  51. Achary S.N., Tyagi A.K. // Powder Diffr. 2005. V. 20. № 3. P. 254. https://doi.org/10.1154/1.1948391
  52. Gulina L.B., Tolstoy V.P., Kasatkin I.A. et al. // CrystEngComm. 2017. V. 19. № 36. P. 5412. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CE01396E
  53. Fedorov P.P., Trnovcova V., Kocherba G.I. et al. // Kristallografiya. 1995. V. 40. № 4. P. 716.
  54. Kasatkin I.A., Gulina L.B., Platonova N.V. et al. // CrystEngComm. 2018. V. 20. № 20. P. 2768. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CE00257F
  55. Gulina L.B., Tolstoy V.P., Petrov Y.V. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 2018. V. 57. № 16. P. 9779. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01375
  56. Yu L., Zhang G., Li S. et al. // J. Cryst. Growth. 2007. V. 299. № 1. P. 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.10.237
  57. Gulina L.B., Tolstoy V.P. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2014. V. 84. № 8. P. 1472. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363214080039
  58. Gulina L.B., Tolstoy V.P., Kasatkin I.A. et al. // J. Fluorine Chem. 2015. V. 180. P. 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2015.09.002
  59. Gulina L.B., Schikora M., Privalov A.F. et al. // Appl. Magn. Reson. 2019. V. 50. № 4. P. 579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-018-1077-z
  60. Gulina L.B., Tolstoy V.P., Kasatkin I.A. et al. // J. Fluorine Chem. 2017. V. 200. P. 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2017.05.006
  61. Cheetham A.K., Fender B.E.F., Fuess H. et al. // Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B. 1976. V. 32. № 1. P. 94. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567740876002380
  62. Fan F.-R., Ding Y., Liu D.-Y. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009. V. 131. № 34. P. 12036. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9036324
  63. Yoo S., Sen R., Simon Z.C. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2023. V. 35. № 16. P. 6274. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c00798
  64. Wen X., Nazemi S.A., da Silva R.R. et al. // Langmuir. 2023. V. 39. № 32. P. 11268. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00799
  65. Yuan H., Wang Y., Yang C. et al. // ChemPhysChem. 2019. V. 20. № 22. P. 2964. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201900524
  66. Amano O., Sasahira A., Kani Y. et al. // J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2004. V. 41. № 1. P. 55. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2004.9715457
  67. Smirnov P.R., Grechin O.V., Vashurin A.S. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 3. P. 382. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622030111
  68. Zhang H., Banfield J.F. // CrystEngComm. 2014. V. 16. № 8. P. 1568. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ce41929k
  69. Zhang J., Huang F., Lin Z. // Nanoscale. 2010. V. 2. № 1. P. 18. https://doi.org/10.1039/b9nr00047j
  70. Popov P.A., Sidorov А.А., Kul’chenkov Е.А. et al. // Ionics. 2016. V. 23. № 1. P. 233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-016-1802-2
  71. Takami T., Pattanathummasid C., Kutana A. et al. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2023. V. 35. P. 29. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/accb32
  72. Kühn H.J., Duparré A., Richter W. et al. // Thin Solid Films. 1991. V. 201. № 2. P. 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(91)90117-G
  73. Zhu G., Liu P., Hojamberdiev M. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. 2010. V. 45. № 7. P. 1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-4168-2
  74. Wang G., Peng Q., Li Y. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009. V. 131. № 40. P. 14200. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja906732y
  75. Lyapin A.A., Ryabochkina P.A., Chabushkin A.N. et al. // J. Lumin. 2015. V. 167. P. 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2015.06.011
  76. Волчек А.А., Кузнецов С.В. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2023. Т. 68. № 8. С. 1005. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22602371
  77. Li Z., Zhang Y., Huang L. et al. // Theranostics. 2016. V. 6. № 13. P. 2380. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.15914
  78. Sorokin N.I., Karimov D.N., Grebenev V.V. et al. // Crystallogr. Rep. 2016. V. 61. № 2. P. 270. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774516020267
  79. Kobayashi S., Kokubo M. // Synlett. 2008. V. 2008. № 10. P. 1562. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1078409
  80. Cao J., Yuan L., Hu S. et al. // CrystEngComm. 2016. V. 18. № 31. P. 5940. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ce01198e
  81. Ai Y., Tu D., Zheng W. et al. // Nanoscale. 2013. V. 5. № 14. P. 6430. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR01529G
  82. Piskunov S., Žguns P.A., Bocharov D. et al. // Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter. 2016. V. 93. № 21. P. 214101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214101
  83. Hu L., Chen J., Sanson A. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016. V. 138. № 27. P. 8320. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b02370
  84. Yang C., Tong P., Lin J.C. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016. V. 109. № 2. P. 023110. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4959083
  85. Greve B.K., Martin K.L., Lee P.L. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010. V. 132. № 44. P. 15496. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja106711v
  86. Gulina L.B., Schäfer M., Privalov A.F. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 2015. V. 143. № 23. P. 234702. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4937415
  87. Denecke M.A., Gunßer W., Privalov A.V. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 1992. V. 52. № 4. P. 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(92)90179-S
  88. Wang F., Grey C.P. // Chem. Mater. 1997. V. 9. № 5. P. 1068. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm970044f
  89. Sorokin N.I., Smirnov A.N., Fedorov P.P. et al. // Russ. J. Electrochem. 2009. V. 45. № 5. P. 606. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193509050206
  90. Gulina L.B., Schäfer M., Privalov A.F. et al. // J. Fluorine Chem. 2016. V. 188. P. 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2016.07.006
  91. Gulina L.B., Privalov A.F., Weigler M. et al. // Appl. Magn. Reson. 2020. V. 51. № 12. P. 1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-020-01247-5
  92. Sinitsyn V.V., Lips O., Privalov A.F. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2003. V. 64. № 7. P. 1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(03)00050-7

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. SEM images of crystals synthesized on the surface of 0.02 M aqueous solutions of Ca(CH3COO)2 (a) and Sr(CH3COO)2 (b) as a result of their treatment with gaseous HF. a, b lowercase; µm replace with μm

Baixar (183KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of SrF2 (a) and PbF2 (b) crystals synthesized as a result of interaction for 40 min with gaseous HF on the surface of 0.02 M aqueous solutions of Sr(CH3COO)2 and Pb(CH3COO)2, respectively. The positions of the maxima in the lower part of the figure characterize the crystal structure of fluorite of SrF2 [50] (a) and β-PbF2 [51] (b).

Baixar (92KB)
Metadados
4. Fig. 3. Optical (a, d) and SEM images (b, c, e) of PbF2 crystals synthesized on the surface of Pb(CH3COO)2 (a-c) and Pb(CH3COO)2/KCH3COO (d, e) solutions under the action of gaseous HF; f - Kikuchi picture of two-dimensional PbF2 crystal with indication of atomic planes indexing.

Baixar (274KB)
Metadados
5. Fig. 4. SEM images at different magnification of crystals synthesized on the surface of 0.1 M (a, b) and 0.05 M (c, d) aqueous solutions of ScCl3; 0.02 M Sc(NO3)3 (e) as a result of interaction with gaseous HF; f - image of ScF3 tube obtained by the NEIM method. a-e line; µm replaced by µm; nm

Baixar (213KB)
Metadados
6. Fig. 5. Results of the study of the crystal structure of materials based on scandium fluoride: a - X-ray film (45% c-ScF3); b - X-ray powder of rod-shaped crystals (96% h-ScF3); c - TEM images and electronogram of the ScF3 tube wall. a- lines in brackets; along the x-axis 2θ (CuKα), deg

Baixar (103KB)
Metadados
7. Fig. 6. SEM images of films synthesized on the surface of 0.035 M LaCl3 aqueous solution (a) and La(NO3)3 nitrate solution (b) as a result of their treatment with gaseous HF; c, d - SEM HF images of particles obtained on the surface of La(NO3)3 nitrate solution under the action of HF.

Baixar (254KB)
Metadados
8. Fig. 7. X-ray diffraction patterns of LaF3 films on the surface of single-crystalline silicon synthesized by 40 min of interaction with gaseous HF on the surface of 0.035 M aqueous LaCl3 solution at equilibrium pH (a) and 0.035 M La(NO3)3 solution in the presence of 1 M HNO3 (b).

Baixar (100KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024