Gluon Anomaly and the Violation of the Zweig Rule

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

It is well known that the gluon anomaly is responsible for the mass of the U(1) Goldstone boson. It is also manifested in the properties of pseudo-Goldstone states: the gluon anomaly in the next order of the 1/Nc expansion induces interactions violating the Zweig rule. A necessary condition for this is the explicit breaking of the chiral symmetry by the masses of light quarks. One of the physical consequences is that the η–η' mixing does not affect the 
 amplitude. Another consequence is the suppression of the first 1/Nc correction to the η–η' mixing angle. The mechanism of such suppression is discussed in detail. The conclusions are based on the 1/Nc expansion and the effective meson Lagrangian of the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model and are compared with the results of the 1/Nc chiral perturbation theory.

Авторлар туралы

A. Osipov

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980, Dubna, Moscow region, Russia

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: aaosipov@jinr.ru

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 11, 3583 (1975).
  2. G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 72, 461 (1974).
  3. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 160, 57 (1979).
  4. H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B 374, 163 (1996).
  5. H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B 374, 181 (1996).
  6. R. Kaiser and H. Leutwyler, Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 623 (2000).
  7. P. Herrera-Sikl'ody, J. I. Latorre, P. Pascual, and J. Taron, Nucl. Phys. B 497, 345 (1997).
  8. A.A Osipov, JETP Lett. 115(6), 30 (2022).
  9. A.A. Osipov, JETP Lett. 115, 371 (2022).
  10. A.A. Osipov, arXiv:hep-ph/2302.14118 (2023).
  11. A.A. Osipov, arXiv:hep-ph/2303.01865 (2023).
  12. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961).
  13. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961).
  14. M.K. Volkov, ЭЧАЯ 17, 432 (1986).
  15. D. Ebert and H. Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. B 271, 188 (1986).
  16. A.A. Osipov, JETP Lett. 113(6), 413 (2021).
  17. A.A. Osipov, Phys. Lett. B 817, 136300 (2021).
  18. A.A. Osipov, Phys. Rev. D 104(10), 105019 (2021).
  19. G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 159, 213 (1979).
  20. C. Rosenzweig, J. Schechter, and G. Trahern, Phys. Rev. D 21, 3388 (1980).
  21. P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 171, 253 (1980).
  22. P. Di Vecchia, F. Nicodemi, R. Pettorino, and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 181, 318 (1981).
  23. G. Cvetic, Ann. Physics 255, 165 (1997).
  24. A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B 234, 189 (1984).
  25. H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 64, 223 (1998).
  26. J. L. Goity, A.M. Bernstein, and B.R. Holstein, Phys. Rev. D 66, 076014 (2002).
  27. D. J. Gross, S.B. Treiman, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2188 (1979).
  28. P. Kroll, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20, 2667 (2005).

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Российская академия наук, 2023