The level of serum soluble E-cadherin as an indicator of prognosis in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas
- Authors: Komarov A.S.1,2, Shestakova V.G.2, Dolgopolov I.S.3,4, Slyusar N.N.2, Chernyayeva E.A.2, Rykov M.Y.4
-
Affiliations:
- Tver Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Tver
- Tver State Medical University, Tver
- Neurovita Clinical Hospital, Moscow
- Russian State Social University, Moscow
- Section: Original Study Articles
- Submitted: 13.01.2026
- Accepted: 25.03.2026
- Published: 25.03.2026
- URL: https://rjonco.com/1028-9984/article/view/700721
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/onco700721
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZROONG
- ID: 700721
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. Criteria for the effectiveness of therapy and the prognosis of disease development remain an urgent problem in oncology. The study of prognostic markers in blood serum is a promising way to track the dynamics of B—cell lymphomas during therapy..
Aim. To analyze the relationship between the presence of a tumor process and the level of the marker E-cadherin.
Materials and Methods. The study included 53 patients (30 men, 23 women) with B-cell lymphomas (stage 1 — 1 patient, stage 2A/2B — 9, 3A/3B — 9, 4A/4B — 34 patients). The level of soluble E-cadherin (sEcad) was determined before the start of treatment, after the third and sixth courses of CT. The dynamics of sEcad levels were performed both in the general group of patients and separately in subgroups of patients without and with recurrent lymphomas. The subgroups were comparable in age and stages of the disease. The control group consisted of 25 people (18 men, 7 women) without oncological pathology. The average age in the study and control groups was 61.2±2.1 (95% CI 57.1–65.3) versus 60.0±2.6 years (95% CI 49.7–60.3), p=0.08. As a normal value (in patients without tumor disease), we assumed a sEcad level of 1.0 ng/ml..
Results. Lymphoma recurrence was observed in 22 (42%) of 53 patients. Seven (13%) patients died of other non-tumor related causes, 1 (2%) patient lost to follow-up. E-cadherin level in the general group before the start of treatment was 3.7 ± 0.4 ng/ml, compared with 0.9 ± 0.1 ng/ml in the control group, p <0.0001. During the therapy, a decrease in the level of E-cadherin was observed after the third and sixth courses of CT to 2.8 ± 0.3 ng/ml and 2.4 ± 0.4 ng/ml, respectively. In the subgroups without relapse (n = 31) and with relapse of lymphomas (n = 22), serum E-cadherin levels before therapy, after three and six courses of chemotherapy were 3.5 ± 0.4, 2.4 ± 0.3 and 1.5 ± 0.2 ng/ml versus 4.1 ± 0.9, 3.4 ± 0.5 and 3.5 ± 0.7 ng/ml, p = 0.5, p = 0.1 and p = 0.003, respectively. Serum E-cadherin level in patients without relapse significantly decreased after 6 courses of CT compared to the time of diagnosis (p = 0.0001). Relapse-free survival (RFS) in the overall patient group was 50.3 ± 8%, with a median follow-up of 43.9 ± 5.2 months. RFS at E-cadherin levels ≤ 1.0 ng/mL and> 1.0 ng/mL after six courses of chemotherapy was 58.3 ± 16% versus 43.3 ± 11% with a mean follow-up of 46.4 ± 10.3 months versus 28.2 ± 4.1 months, respectively (p = 0.045).
Conclusions. The risk of B-lymphoma recurrence is lower at sEcad <1.0 ng/ml after six courses of therapy than at higher values of this marker. A decrease in this marker during treatment indicates a good response to therapy. For further research, it is necessary to expand the observation groups and standardize methods for determining the sEcad level.
Full Text
Табл. 1. Клинико-демографическая характеристика исследуемой группы пациентов
Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients
Показатель | Значение |
Возраст, (M±SD), лет | 61,2±2,1 |
Пол, (n, %) |
|
Мужской | 30 (57%) |
Женский | 23 (43%) |
Нозология, МКБ-10, (n, %): |
|
С83.3 — Диффузная крупноклеточная В-клеточная лимфома (ДВКЛ) | 51 (96%) |
C85.2 — Медиастинальная (тимусная) большая В-клеточная лимфома (ПМВКЛ) | 1 (2%) |
С83.7 — Лимфома Беркитта (ЛБ) | 1 (2%) |
Стадия лимфомы, Ann-Arbor, (n, %): |
|
1 стадия | 1 (2%) |
2А/2В стадия | 9 (17%) |
3А/3В стадия | 9 (17%) |
4А/4В стадия | 34 (64%) |
Табл. 2. Патологические события в исследуемой группе пациентов с В-клеточными лимфомами высокой степени злокачественности, в том числе в зависимости от наличия или отсутствия рецидива
Table 2. Pathological events in the study group of patients with high-grade B-cell lymphomas, depending on the presence or absence of relapse
Группы/Статус | Умерло (n, %)/Живы (n, %) | Рецидив | Смерть от других причин | Потеря из наблюдения |
Общая | 30 (57%)/23 (43%) | 22 | 7 | 1 |
Группа без рецидива | 8 (26%)/23 (43%) | 0 | 7** | 1 |
Группа с рецидивом | 22 (100%)/– | 22* | – | – |
Примечания. * — 1 больной умер от ОНМК на фоне рецидива; ** — Covid-19 — 4, инфаркт — 1, ОНМК — 1, аспирационная пневмония — 1.
Табл. 3. Уровень сывороточного растворимого Е-кадгерина (sEcad ) в динамике, (M±SD, 95% доверительный интервал, нг/мл)
Table 3. Dynamics of serum soluble E-cadherin (sEcad) level (M±SD, 95% confidence interval, ng/mL)
Группа / Статус | До начала терапии Уровень sEcad | После 3 курсов ХТ Уровень sEcad | После 6 курсов ХТ Уровень sEcad | р |
Контрольная группа (n=25) | 0,9±0,1 (95% ДИ 0,8-1,0) | — | — | <0,0001* |
Исследуемая (n=53) | 3,7±0,4 (95% ДИ 2,9–4,5) | 2,8±0,3 (95% ДИ 2,7–3,4) | 2,4±0,4 (95% ДИ 1,7–3,1) | 0,03** |
Без рецидива (n=31) | 3,5±0,4 (95% ДИ 2,6–4,3) | 2,4±0,3 (95% ДИ 1,8–3,1) | 1,5±0,2 (95% ДИ 1,1–1,9) | 0,003*** |
Рецидив (n=22) | 4,1±0,9 (95% ДИ 2,3–5,9) | 3,4±0,5 (95% ДИ 2,3–4,4) | 3,5±0,7 (95% ДИ 2,1–4,9) |
Примечания. *— между группами исследуемой и контрольной; **— между уровнями до начала терапии и после 6 курсов ХТ; *** — между уровнями после 6 курсов ХТ в подгруппа с и без рецидива.
Рис. 1. Динамика уровней растворимого Е-кадгерина (sEcad) в сыворотке в общей группе (: ХТ — химиотерапия.
Рис. 2. Динамика уровней растворимого Е-кадгерина (sEcad) в сыворотке в подгруппе пациентов без рецидива (n=31) до химиотерапии на момент диагностики лимфомы, после 3 курсов химиотерапии и после 6 курсов химиотерапии): ХТ — химиотерапия.
Рис. 3. Зависимость безрецидивной выживаемости от уровня растворимого Е-кадгерина (sEcad) после шести курсов химиотерапии: cплошная линия — безрецидивная выживаемость пациентов с уровнем растворимого Е-кадгерина (sEcad) ≤1,0 нг/мл; пунктирная линия — безрецидивная выживаемость пациентов с уровнем сывороточного Е-кадгерина >1,0 нг/мл.
About the authors
Andrey S. Komarov
Tver Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Tver; Tver State Medical University, Tver
Email: andrey_komarow@inbox.ru
Russian Federation, Tver, Russia; Tver, Russia
Valeriya G. Shestakova
Tver State Medical University, Tver
Email: shestvg@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1136-7396
SPIN-code: 4541-8220
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation, Tver, RussiaIgor S. Dolgopolov
Neurovita Clinical Hospital, Moscow; Russian State Social University, Moscow
Email: irdolgopolov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9777-1220
SPIN-code: 4312-9786
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; Moscow, RussiaNikolai N. Slyusar
Tver State Medical University, Tver
Email: slusar2011@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7865-0984
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Tver, RussiaElena A. Chernyayeva
Tver State Medical University, Tver
Email: martus12345@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-5106-9582
Russian Federation, Tver, Russia
Maxim Yu. Rykov
Russian State Social University, Moscow
Author for correspondence.
Email: wordex2006@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8398-7001
SPIN-code: 7652-0122
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatrics
Russian Federation, Moscow, RussiaReferences
- Sawalha Y. Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Look at the Approved and Emerging Therapies. J Pers Med. 2021;11(12):1345. doi: 10.3390/jpm11121345 EDN: OCUWEG
- Li J, Liu X, Yao Z, Zhang M. High-Grade B-Cell Lymphomas, Not Otherwise Specified: A Study of 41 Cases. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:1903–1912. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S243753 EDN: EHBTGW
- Petrova AA, Samoilova SI, Magomedkerimova LV, Parts SA, Reshetov IV. The role of E-cadherin and β-catenin in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2023;22(6):130–137. doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2023-22-6-130-137 EDN: DEPOKJ
- Katta R, Nugala S, Kolakonda M, Chinnam A. Evaluation of Immunohistochemical Expression of Beta-catenin and E-cadherin as Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma - An Analytical Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Center. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2025;15(2):98–103. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_535_24 EDN: IAHJDE
- Ahamed Y, Hossain M, Baral S, et al. The diagnostic value of prostate health index combined with soluble e-cadherin for prostate cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025;16:1531866. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1531866 EDN: JLXFMB
- Okugawa Y, Toiyama Y, Inoue Y, et al. Clinical significance of serum soluble E-cadherin in colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Res. 2012;175(2):e67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.11.009
- Hu X, Xiong Y, Villodre ES, Zhang H, et al.; MDACC Inflammatory Breast Cancer Team; Woodward WA, Chen J, Debeb BG. Soluble E-cadherin Drives Brain Metastasis in Inflammatory Breast Cancer. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 202524:2025.06.18.660428. 10.1101/2025.06.18.660428. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.18.660428
- Tsaur I, Thomas A, Juengel E, et al. Deciphering the Molecular Machinery-Influence of sE-Cadherin on Tumorigenic Traits of Prostate. Cancer Cells Biology (Basel). 2021;10(10):1007. doi: 10.3390/biology10101007 EDN: ZGUEKG
- Hu QP, Kuang JY, Yang QK, et al. Beyond a tumor suppressor: Soluble E-cadherin promotes the progression of cancer. Int J. Cancer. 2016;138:2804–2812. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29982 EDN: WSXIRV
- Jordaan G, Liao W, Sharma S. E-cadherin gene re-expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells by HDAC inhibitors. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:88. 10.1186/1471-2407-13-88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-88 EDN: YXJNVN
- Christou N, Perraud A, Blondy S, et al. E-cadherin: A potential biomarker of colorectal cancer prognosis. Oncol Lett. 2017;13(6):4571–4576. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6063
- Repetto O, De Paoli P, De Re V, et al. Levels of Soluble E-Cadherin in Breast, Gastric, and Colorectal Cancers. Biomed Res Int. 2014:7. doi: 10.1155/2014/408047
- Wilmanns C, Grossmann J, Steinhauer S, et al. Soluble serum E-cadherin as a marker of tumour progression in colorectal cancer patients. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2004;21(1):75–8 EDN: FMDNHH
- Velikova G, Banks RE, Gearing A, et al. Serum concentrations of soluble adhesion molecules in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998;77(11):1857–1863. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.309
- Zhu S, Zhao G, Zhao X, et al. Elevated soluble E-cadherin during the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process and as a diagnostic marker in colorectal cancer. Gene. 2020;754:144899. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144899 EDN: ULKXNU
Supplementary files

