Hydrothermal Synthesis and Photocatalytic Properties of Cobalt-Doped Tungsten Oxide

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Hexagonal tungsten trioxide–base interstitial solid solutions of general formula CoxWO3, where 0.01 ≤ x ≤ 0.09, were prepared hydrothermally. The dopant homogeneity extent was found to depend on рН in the working solution. Interstitial solid solutions with the highest Co2+ concentrations were formed at рН of 2.3. The CoxWO3 samples with a fiber-like morphology with a fiber diameter of ca. 40 nm, which were prepared at рН of 2.3, had the highest specific surface area, equal to 38.6 m2/g. The key parameter for the stability of the CoxWO3 crystal structure appeared to be ammonium ions residing in the hexagonal channels of the crystal structure. When tested as photocatalysts of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene oxidation under the UV light, the prepared samples showed high chloroarene conversions and low selectivities to yield a wide range of organic compounds, including chlorine-free ones.

作者简介

G. Zakharova

Institute of Solid State Chemistry, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: volkov@ihim.uran.ru
620990, Yekaterinburg, Russia

N. Podval’naya

Institute of Solid State Chemistry, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: volkov@ihim.uran.ru
620990, Yekaterinburg, Russia

T. Gorbunova

Postovsky Institute of Organic Synthesis, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: volkov@ihim.uran.ru
620108, Yekaterinburg, Russia

M. Pervova

Postovsky Institute of Organic Synthesis, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: volkov@ihim.uran.ru
620108, Yekaterinburg, Russia

参考

  1. Zheng H., Ou J.Z., Strano M.S. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011. V. 21. № 12. P. 2175. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201002477
  2. Huang Z.-F., Song J., Pan L. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2015. V. 27. № 36. P. 5309. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501217
  3. Бушкова Т.М., Егорова А.А., Хорошилов А.В. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. Т. 66. № 4. С. 470.
  4. Bently J., Desai S., Bastakoti B.P. // Chem. Eur. J. 2021. V. 27. № 36. P. 9241. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202100649
  5. Lei G., Lou C., Liu X. et al. // Sens. Actuators B. Chem. 2021. V. 341. № 15. P. 129996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.129996
  6. Purushothaman K.K., Muralidharan G., Vijayakumar S. // Mater. Lett. 2021. V. 296. 129881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129881
  7. Zheng F., Xi C., Xu J. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2019. V. 772. P. 933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.085
  8. Филиппова А.Д., Румянцев А.А., Баранчиков А.Е. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. № 6. С. 706.
  9. Murillo-Sierra J.C., Hernández-Ramírez A., Hinojosa-Reyes L. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2021. V. 5. 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2020.100070
  10. Dong P., Hou G., Xi X. et al. // Environ. Sci.: Nano. 2017. V. 4. № 3. P. 539. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6en00478d
  11. Dutta V., Sharma S., Raizada P. et al. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021. V. 9. № 1. 105018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.105018
  12. Razali N.A.M., Salleh W.N.W., Aziz F. et al. // J. Clean. Prod. 2021. V. 309. 127438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127438
  13. Khaki M.R.D., Shafeeyan M.S., Raman A.A.A. et al. // J. Environ. Manag. 2017. V. 198. № 2. P. 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.099
  14. Jacob K.A., Peter P.M., Jose P.E. et al. // Mater. Today: Proc. 2022. V. 49. № 2. 1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.104
  15. Song H., Li Y., Lou Z. et al. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015. V. 166–167. № 5. P. 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.020
  16. Solarska R., Alexander B.D., Braun A. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2010. V. 55. № 26. P. 7780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.12.016
  17. Shannow R.D. // Acta Crystallogr. A. 1976. V. 32. № 5. P. 751. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567739476001551
  18. Mehmood F., Iqbal J., Jan T. et al. // Vib. Spectr. 2017. V. 93. P. 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2017.09.005
  19. Sun S., Chang X., Li Z. // Mater. Charact. 2012. V. 73. P. 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2012.08.005
  20. Sivakarthik P., Thangaraj V., Parthibavarman M. // J. Mater. Sc.: Mater. Electron. 2017. V. 28. № 8. P. 5990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-6274-7
  21. Liu Z., Liu B., Xie W. et al. // Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016. V. 235. P. 614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.05.140
  22. Shen K., Sheng K., Wang Z. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020. V. 501. P. 144003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144003
  23. Lim J.-C., Jin C., Choi M.S. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2021. V. 47. № 15. P. 20956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.095
  24. Hariharan V., Aroulmoji V., Prabakaran K. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2016. V. 689. P. 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.136
  25. Kumar R.D., Karuppuchamy S. // J. Alloys Compd. 2016. V. 674. P. 384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.074
  26. Dalenjan F.A., Bagheri-Mohagheghi M.M., Shirpay A. // J. Solid State Electrochem. 2022. V. 22. № 2. P. 401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-021-05076-9
  27. Jia Q., Ji H., Gao P. et al. // J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2015. V. 26. № 8. P. 5792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-015-3138-5
  28. Sing K.S.W., Everett D.H., Haul R.A.W. et al. // Pure Appl. Chem. 1985. V. 57. № 4. P. 603. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603
  29. Moura J.V.B., Silveira J.V., da Silva Filho J.G. et al. // Vib. Spectrosc. 2018. V. 98. P. 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2018.07.008
  30. Szilágyi I.M., Wang L., Gouma P.-I. et al. // Mater. Res. Bull. 2009. V. 44. № 3. P. 505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2008.08.003
  31. Szilágyi I.M., Madarász J., Pokol G. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2008. V. 20. № 12. P. 4116. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm800668x
  32. Mohamed M.M., Salama T.M., Hegazy M.A. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019. V. 44. № 10. P. 4724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.218
  33. ThOny A., Rossi M.J. // J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 1997. V. 104. № 1–3. P. 25.
  34. van Wijk D., Cohet E., Gard A. et al. // Chemosphere. 2006. V. 62. № 8. P. 1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.07.010
  35. Zolezzi M., Cattaneo C., Tarazona J.V. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005. V. 39. № 9. P. 2920. https://doi.org/10.1021/es049214x
  36. Horikoshi S., Minami D., Ito S. et al. // J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 2011. V. 217. № 1. P. 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.10.001
  37. Dong W.H., Zhang P., Lin X.Y. et al. // Sci. Total Environ. 2015. V. 505. P. 216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.002

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2.

下载 (367KB)
索引源数据
3.

下载 (100KB)
索引源数据
4.

下载 (1MB)
索引源数据
5.

下载 (167KB)
索引源数据
6.

下载 (205KB)
索引源数据
7.

下载 (218KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Г.С. Захарова, Н.В. Подвальная, Т.И. Горбунова, М.Г. Первова, 2023