ASSESSMENT OF PRECARIOUS EMPLOYMENT IN THE RUSSIAN FORMAL SECTOR: FROM THE LEVEL OF WORKERS TO THE LEVEL OF HOUSEHOLDS

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The aim of the study was to identify precarious employment and its prevalence in employed households, as well as the effects of the presence and concentration of precariously employed workers on the financial situation of households. The methodological basis of the study for identifying precarious employment was formed by its verified key and non-key objective indicators, and for determining the financial situation – by per capita monetary income standards. The empirical basis of the study was formed by representative data from the 32nd round of Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey conducted by the National Research University Higher School of Economics. Employment segmentation is carried out based on the use of indicators of precarious employment; the segment of precarious employment and the share of workers employed in it is identified. It is revealed that the presence of precariously employed workers negatively affects the financial situation of households and the possibilities of ensuring their sustainability. Negative trends are intensifying with an increase in the number of precariously employed people in the household. The presence of the unemployed and of precariously employed workers in a household significantly reduces its chances of providing a monetary income that would guarantee the sustainability of the financial situation.

作者简介

E. Odintsova

Institute of Economics (RAS)

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: odin_ev@mail.ru
Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Бобков В.Н. Неустойчивая занятость в Российской Федерации: состояние и направления снижения // Народонаселение. 2019. № 2. С. 91–104. doi: 10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00018.
  2. Бобков В.Н., Бобков Н.В. Неформальная занятость: идентификация и векторы преобразования. Дискурс на 14-ой ежегодной Международной конференции Европейской сети мониторинга регионального и местного рынка труда (EN RLMM) (г. Москва, 3–4 октября 2019 г.) // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. 2019. Т. 15. № 4. С. 9–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/99-9836-2019-10078.
  3. Неустойчивая занятость в Российской Федерации: теория и методология выявления, оценивание и вектор сокращения / Гл. науч. ред. В.Н. Бобков. 2-е изд., стер. М.: КНОРУС, 2019. 342 с.
  4. Неустойчивость занятости: международный и российский контексты будущего сферы труда: монография / Под редакцией В. Н. Бобкова. М.: РеалПринт, 2017. 560 с.
  5. Kreshpaj B., Orellana C., Burström B. et al. What is precarious employment? A systematic review of definitions and operationalizations from quantitative and qualitative studies // Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2020. Vol. 46. No. 3. P. 235–247.
  6. Александрова О.А., Файман Н.С. Критерии неустойчивой занятости научно-педагогических кадров // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. 2023. Т. 19. № 1. С. 70–85. doi: 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_1_6_70_85.
  7. Бобков В. Н., Черных Е. А. Платформенная занятость: масштабы и признаки неустойчивости // Мир новой экономики. 2020. Т. 14. № 2. С. 6–15. doi: 10.26794/2220-6469-2020-14-2-6-15.
  8. Бобков В.Н., Одинцова Е.В., Иванова Т.В., Чащина Т.В. Значимые индикаторы неустойчивой занятости и их приоритетность // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. 2022. Т. 18. № 4. С. 502–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.4.7.
  9. Бобков В.Н., Одинцова Е.В., Подвойский Г.Л. Устойчивая и неустойчивая занятость в Российской Федерации // Мир новой экономики. 2023. Т. 17. № 3. С. 109–124. doi: 10.26794/2220-6469-2023-17-3-109-124.
  10. Tonkikh N.V., Kamarova T.A., Markova T.L. Sustainability of digital and non-digital forms of employment: comparative assessments // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2024. Vol. 17. Issue 5. P. 232–246. DOI: 10.15838/ esc.2024.5.95.13.
  11. Vives A., Amable M., Ferrer M., et al. The Employment Precariousness Scale (EPRES): psychometric properties of a new tool for epidemiological studies among waged and salaried workers // Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2010. Vol. 67. Issue 8. P. 548–555.
  12. Vives A., González F., Moncada S., Llorens C., Benach J. Measuring precarious employment in times of crisis: the revised Employment Precariousness Scale (EPRES) in Spain // Gaceta Sanitaria. 2015. Vol. 29. Issue 5. P. 379–382. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.06.008.
  13. Karl M., Staudt A., Vives A., et al. Validation of the Employment Precariousness Scale and its associations with mental health outcomes: results from a prospective community-based study of pregnant women and their partners in Dresden, Germany // BMJ Open. 2024. Vol. 14. Issue 8. e077206. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077206.
  14. Puig-Barrachina V., Vanroelen C., Vives A., Martínez J.M., Muntaner C., Levecque K., Benach J., Louckx F. Measuring employment precariousness in the European Working Conditions Survey: The social distribution in Europe // WORK. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 1. P. 143–161. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-131645.
  15. Jonsson J., Vives A., Benach J., Kjellberg K., Selander J., Johansson G., Bodin T. Measuring precarious employment in Sweden: translation, adaptation and psychometric properties of the Employment Precariousness Scale (EPRES) // BMJ Open. 2019. Vol. 9. Issue 9. e029577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029577.
  16. От прекарной занятости к прекаризации жизни. Коллективная монография / Под ред. Ж.Т. Тощенко. М.: Издательство «Весь Мир», 2022. 364 с. doi: 10.55604/9785777708861.
  17. Мониторинг доходов и уровня жизни населения России – 2023 год: [Ежегодник]. Вып. 2(203) / В.Н. Бобков, А.А. Гулюгина, Е.В. Одинцова [и др.]; отв. ред. В.Н. Бобков, А.А. Гулюгина. М.: ИЭ РАН, 2024. 182 с.
  18. Popov A.V. Implications of precarization in the context of generational groups: Direct and indirect effects // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2022. Vol. 15. Issue 6. P. 167–181. doi: 10.15838/esc.2022.6.84.10.
  19. Vanroelen C., Julià M., Van Aerden K. Precarious Employment: An Overlooked Determinant of Workers’ Health and Well-Being? In: Korunka C. (eds.) Flexible Working Practices and Approaches. Springer, Cham. 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74128-0_12.
  20. Park H., Park G.-R., Kim J. Transitioning into and out of precarious employment and life satisfaction: Evidence from asymmetric fixed effects models // Social Science & Medicine. 2024. Vol. 341. 116539. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116539.
  21. Lewchuk W. Precarious jobs: Where are they, and how do they affect well-being? // The Economic and Labour Relations Review. 2017. Vol. 28. Issue 3. P. 402–419. doi: 10.1177/1035304617722943.
  22. Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V. Low level and quality of life among economically active population: identification criteria and assessment of occurrence // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2020. Vol. 13. Issue 5. P. 168–181. doi: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.10.
  23. The Precarity Penalty: How Insecure Employment Disadvantages Workers and Their Families / W. Lewchuk, M. Laflèche, S. Procyk, Ch. Cook, D. Dyson, L. Goldring, K. Lior, A. Meisner, J. Shields, A. Tambureno, P. Viducis // Alternate Routes. 2016. Vol. 27. P. 87–108.
  24. Han W.J., Zhang L. Precarious parental employment conditions and family poverty experiences in the first six years of a child’s life // Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2022. Vol. 31. P. 1106–1120. doi: 10.1007/s10826-021-02154-4.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025