“To Brew a Prefabricated Medley of the Wreckage of All Groups”: The Russian Association of Proletarian Writers in the Federation of Associations of Soviet Writers

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The Federation of Soviet Writers’ Associations (FOSP) is examined for the first time from the perspective of the sociology of the literary process. The traditional historical and literary question of who created the FOSP and why is replaced here by a more significant problem from the point of view of the literary process: why did the FOSP emerge in the conditions of competition on the market of literary production, who needed the FOSP most in the conditions of the market economy, and, finally, whether there was any prospect of the FOSP continuing to function after 1932. It is shown that the FOSP and its institutions, first and foremost the Federation publishing house, were the legitimate product of the NEP era and served the strategic goals of the Proletarian Union of Soviet Writers. Since the “genetic code” of the FOSP, like that of the Proletarian Association, belonged to the NEP era, the Federation had no chance of taking root in the economic and political conditions of the 1930s.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Daria S. Moskovskaya

A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: darya-mos@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8089-9604

Doct. Sci. (Philol.), Head Researcher, Head of the Manuscripts Department

Russian Federation, 25a Povarskaya Str., Moscow, 121069

References

  1. Brown, E.J. The Proletarian Episode in Russian Literature, 1928–1932. N.Y.: Columbia univ. Press Publ., 1953. 311 p. (In English)
  2. Sheshukov, S.I. Neistovye revniteli: iz istorii literaturnoj borby 20-h godov [Fierce Zealots: From the History of the Literary Struggle of the 1920s]. Moscow: MPGU Publ., 2013. 336 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Metcalf, A. The Founding of the Federation of Soviet Writers: The Forgotten Factor in Soviet Literature of the Late Twenties. The Slavonic and East European Review. Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 609–616. (In English)
  4. Rogachevskiy, A. V preddverii sojuza pisatelej SSSR: FOSP i institucionalnye ramki objedinenija sovetskih pisatelej v 1920-e gody [On the Threshold of the Union of Writers of the USSR: FOSP and the Institutional Framework of the Association of Soviet Writers in the 1920s]. Sotsrealisticheskii kanon. Sbornik statei pod obshchei redaktsiei X. Giuntera i E. Dobrenko [Canon of Socialist Realism. Collection of Articles under the General Editorship of H. Günther and E. Dobrenko]. St. Petersburg: Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2000, pp. 265–278. (In Russ.)
  5. Berger, P., Lukman, T. Socialnoe konstruirovanie realnosti. Traktat po sociologii znanija [The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge]. Translated by E.D. Rutkevich. Moscow: Medium Publ., 1995. 323 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Kovalenko, D.A., Oznobishin, D.V. K voprosu o revo lju cionnom tvorchestve rabochih mass posle sverzhenija samoderzhavija v Rossii [On the Question of the Revolutionary Creativity of the Working Masses after the Overthrow of Autocracy in Russia]. Voprosy istorii [Topics in the Study of History]. 1958, No. 1, pp. 22–44. (In Russ.)
  7. Veber, M. Izbrannye proizvedenija [Selected Writings], Transl. from German. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1990. 804 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Veblen, T. Teorija prazdnogo klassa [The Theory of the Leisure Class]. Moscow: AST Publ., 2021. 416 p. (In Russ.)
  9. Sovetskoe literaturovedenie i kritika. Bibliograficheskij ukazatel [Soviet Literary Studies and Criticism. Bibliographical Index.] Moscow, 1966. 586 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Konec institucij kultury dvadcatyh godov v Leningrade: po arhivnym materialam [The End of the Cultural Institutions of the Twenties in Leningrad: on the Basis of Archival Material]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2014. 492 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Kornienko, N.V. “Njepovskaja ottepel”: stanovlenie in sti tuta sovetskoj literaturnoj kritiki [“Nepov’s Thaw”: The Formation of the Institution of Soviet Literary Criticism]. Moscow: IMLI RAN Publ., 2010. 498 p. (In Russ.)
  12. Gudkov, L., Dubin, B. Literatura kak socialnyj institut: Statji po sociologii literatury [Literature as a Social Institution: Articles on the Sociology of Literature]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2004. 350 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Gudkov, L., Dubin, B., Strada, V. Literatura i ob shhes tvo: Vvedenie v sociologiju literatury [Literature and Society: An Introduction to the Sociology of Literature]. Moscow: RGGU Publ., In-t evrop. kultur, 1998. 76 p. (In Russ.)
  14. Bourdieu, P. Pole literatury [The Field of Literature]. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/3042 (date of access: 18.07.2023). (In Russ.)
  15. Stepanov, B.E. Boris Dubin i rossijskij proekt sociologii kultury [Boris Dubin and the Russian Project of Socio logy of Culture]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovre mennost [Social Science and Modernity]. 2015, No. 6, pp. 163–173. (In Russ.)
  16. Moskovskaya, D.S., Bakshaeva, N.Ju., Romanova, O.V. Massovost i “massovizatsiia” v rannesovetskom lite ra tur nom protsesse [Mass Character and “Masso vi za tion” in the Early Soviet Literary Process]. Studia Lit te rarum. 2022, No. 4, Vol. 7, pp. 10–33. URL: https:// doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-4-10-33 (In Russ.)
  17. Frezinskiy, B.Ja. Pisateli i sovetskie vozhdi: izbrannye sjuzhety 1919–1960 godov [Writers and Soviet Leaders: Selected Stories 1919–1960.]. Moscow: Jellis Lak 2000 Publ., 2008. 668 p. (In Russ.)
  18. Dinershtein, E.A. A.K. Voronskiy: V poiskah zhivoj vody [А.К. Voronsky: In Search of Living Water]. Mos cow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2001. 357 p. (In Russ.)
  19. Zelenov, M.V. Apparat CK RKP(b) – VKP(b), cenzura i istoricheskaja nauka v 1920-e gody [The Apparatus of the Central Committee of the RCP(b) – All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, Censorship and Historical Science in the 1920s]. N. Novgorod: Volgo-Vjat. akad. gos. Sluzhby Publ., 2000. 538 p. (In Russ.)
  20. Averbach, L. Kulturnaja revoljucija i sovremennaja lite rature [The Cultural Revolution and Modern Lite rature]. Na literaturnom postu [At the Literary Post]. 1928, No. 13–14, pp. 1–11. (In Russ.)
  21. Kuzminov, Ja.I., Judkevich, M.M. Institucionalnaja jekonomika [Institutional Economics]. URL: https://www.studmed.ru/kuzminov-yai-yudkevich-mm-institucionalnaya-ekonomika_6afac2a.html (date of access: 16.09.2023). (In Russ.)
  22. Na putjah kulturnoj revoljucii [On the Paths of Cultural Revolution]. Na literaturnom postu [At the Literary Post]. 1926, No. 1, pp. 1–3. (In Russ.)
  23. Moskovskaya, D.S., Galtsova, E.D. “Izdatelskie strasti” FOSP (po materialam Otdela rukopisej IMLI RAN [FOSP’S “Publishing Passion”: on the Materials Held in the Department of Manuscripts of IWL RAS]. Studia Litterarum. 2020, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 394–419. URL: https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2020-5-4-394-41 (In Russ.)
  24. Korabelnikov, G. Chto takoe MAPP? [What is MAPP?]. Na literaturnom postu [At the Literary Post]. 1926, No. 3, pp. 44–46. (In Russ.)
  25. Rezoljucija CK VKP (b) “O politike partii v hudoz hest vennoj literature” [Resolution of the Central Com mittee of the All-Union Communist Party of the Bol sheviks “On the Party’s Policy in Fiction”]. URL: http://www.hist.msu.ru/ER/Etext/USSR/1925.html (date of access: 18.07.2023). (In Russ.)
  26. “Schastje literatury”. Gosudarstvo i pisateli [“The Happiness of Literature”. The State and Writers], Compl. by D.L. Babichenko. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 1997. 318 p. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences