Promising measures to reduce the mortality in Russia: an analytical review

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to identify promising measures to reduce mortality in Russia.

Methods used included analysis of systematic reviews from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. 

Results. Promising measures for reducing mortality in Russia include promoting healthy behaviour (tobacco control, alcohol control, support for healthy diet, physical activity) and preventing death due to external causes. It is necessary to increase the effectiveness of disease management, including arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular accidents, hepatitis C, HIV. This could require intensifying digital transformation of health care, implementing modern teamwork approaches to the patient’s treatment and follow-up with greater involvement of nurses and other personnel. In terms of screening, it is essential to expand coverage and introduce modern, effective screening methods for colorectal cancer, cervical cancer, and neonatal screening. It is necessary to expand vaccination against Covid-19, vaccination of the elderly from Pneumococcus, and teenagers from HPV. Prevention of mortality from external causes should include sets of measures targeted at the prevention of suicides, traffic accidents, fires, drownings, etc., in addition to alcohol control measures. Finally, increasing health care financing, including medication provision, can bring additional years of life.

Conclusions. Russia has significant potential to implement new measures to reduce the mortality.

About the authors

Olga S. Kobyakova

Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics

Author for correspondence.
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0098-1403
Russian Federation

Vladimir I. Starodubov

Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3625-4278
Russian Federation

Daria A. Khaltourina

Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics

Email: khaltourina@mednet.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1230-9385

MD, PhD., Head of the Department of risk factors prevention and communication technologies in healthcare of the Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics, Moscow, 127254, Russian Federation.

e-mail: khaltourina@mednet.ru

Russian Federation

Viktor A. Zykov

Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9095-6281
Russian Federation

Tatiana S. Zubkova

Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7971-5855
Russian Federation

Elena S. Zamiatnina

Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2479-6069
Russian Federation

References

  1. Arkhangel’skiy V.N., Bozhevolnov Yu.V., Goldstoun Dzh., Zvereva N.V., Zin’kina Yu.V., Korotaev A.V., et al. Too Late in 10 years. Demographic Policy of the Russian Federation: Scenarios and Challenges [Cherez 10 let budet pozdno. Demograficheskaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii: stsenarii i vyzovy]. Moscow; 2014. Available at: https://inoe.org/content/report.pdf (in Russian)
  2. WHO. Tackling NCDs: ‘Best buys’ and other recommended interventions for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases; 2017. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259232
  3. Ulumbekova G.E. The program of urgent measures in the healthcare sector of the Russian Federation to overcome the systemic crisis. Orgzdrav: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. Vestnik VShOUZ. 2020; 6(1): 4–16. https://doi.org/10.24411/2411-8621-2020-11001 (in Russian)
  4. Markes P.V. World Bank. Dying Too Young: Addressing Premature Mortality and Ill Health Due to Non-Communicable Diseases and Injuries in the Russian Federation [Rano umirat’. Problemy vysokogo urovnya zabolevaemosti i prezhdevremennoy smertnosti ot neinfektsionnykh zabolevaniy i travm v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i puti ikh resheniya]. Moscow: Vsemirnyy bank; 2005. Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/201881468296681271/pdf/323770SR0RUSSI00Box338915B00PUBLIC0.pdf (in Russian)
  5. Herttua K., Mäkelä P., Martikainen P. Minimum prices for alcohol and educational disparities in alcohol-related mortality. Epidemiology. 2015; 26(3): 337–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000260
  6. Wilkinson C., Livingston M., Room R. Impacts of changes to trading hours of liquor licences on alcohol-related harm: a systematic review 2005-2015. Public Health Res. Pract. 2016; 26(4): 2641644. https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp2641644
  7. Brachowicz N., Castello J.V. Is changing the minimum legal drinking age an effective policy tool? Health Econ. 2019; 28(12): 1483–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3955
  8. Levy D.T., Tam J., Kuo C., Fong G.T., Chaloupka F. The Impact of Implementing Tobacco Control Policies: The 2017 Tobacco Control Policy Scorecard. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 2018; 24(5): 448–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000780
  9. Shankleman M., Sykes C., Mandeville K.L., Di Costa S., Yarrow K. Standardised (plain) cigarette packaging increases attention to both text-based and graphical health warnings: experimental evidence. Public Health. 2015; 129(1): 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2014.10.019
  10. Finan L.J., Lipperman-Kreda S., Abadi M., Grube J.W., Kaner E., Balassone A., et al. Tobacco outlet density and adolescents’ cigarette smoking: a meta-analysis. Tob. Control. 2019; 28(1): 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054065
  11. Bleich S.N., Economos C.D., Spiker M.L., Vercammen K.A., VanEpps E.M., Block J.P., et al. A systematic review of calorie labeling and modified calorie labeling interventions: impact on consumer and restaurant behavior. Obesity. 2017; 25(12): 2018–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21940
  12. Sacco J., Lillico H.G., Chen E., Hobin E. The influence of menu labelling on food choices among children and adolescents: a systematic review of the literature. Perspect. Public Health. 2017; 137(3): 173–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913916658498
  13. Hobin E., Bollinger B., Sacco J., Liebman E., Vanderlee L., Zuo F., et al. Consumers’ response to an on-shelf nutrition labelling system in supermarkets: evidence to inform policy and practice. Milbank Q. 2017; 95(3): 494–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12277
  14. Hyseni L., Elliot-Green A., Lloyd-Williams F., Kypridemos C., O’Flaherty M., McGill R., et al. Systematic review of dietary salt reduction policies: Evidence for an effectiveness hierarchy? PLoS One. 2017; 12(5): e0177535. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177535
  15. Shaw S.C., Ntani G., Baird J., Vogel C.A. A systematic review of the influences of food store product placement on dietary-related outcomes. Nutr. Rev. 2020; 78(12): 1030–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaa024
  16. Gittelsohn J., Trude A.C.B., Kim H. Pricing strategies to encourage availability, purchase, and consumption of healthy foods and beverages: a systematic review. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2017; 14: E107. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd14.170213
  17. FAO. Promoting healthy diets through nutrition education and changes in the food environment: an international review of actions and their effectiveness. Rome: FAO; 2013. Available at: https://www.fao.org/docrep/017/i3235e/i3235e.pdf
  18. Zimmermann M.B. The effects of iodine deficiency in pregnancy and infancy. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2012; 26(1): 108–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01275.x
  19. Zimmermann M.B., Galetti V. Iodine intake as a risk factor for thyroid cancer: a comprehensive review of animal and human studies. Thyroid Res. 2015; 8: 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-015-0020-8
  20. Lamming L., Pears S., Mason D., Morton K., Bijker M., Sutton S., et al. What do we know about brief interventions for physical activity that could be delivered in primary care consultations? A systematic review of reviews. Prev. Med. 2017; 99: 152–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.017
  21. Mölenberg F.J.M., Panter J., Burdorf A., van Lenthe F.J. A systematic review of the effect of infrastructural interventions to promote cycling: strengthening causal inference from observational data. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2019; 16(1): 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0850-1
  22. Hipp J.A., Aaron Hipp J., Dodson E.A., Lee J.A., Marx C.M., Yang L., et al. Mixed methods analysis of eighteen worksite policies, programs, and environments for physical activity. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2017; 14(1): 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0533-8
  23. Laine J., Kuvaja-Köllner V., Pietilä E., Koivuneva M., Valtonen H., Kankaanpää E. Cost-effectiveness of population-level physical activity interventions: a systematic review. Am. J. Health Promot. 2014; 29(2): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.131210-lit-622
  24. Baker P.R.A., Francis D.P., Soares J., Weightman A.L., Foster C. Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; 1: CD008366. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008366.pub3
  25. de Martel C., Plummer M., Vignat J., Franceschi S. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. Int. J. Cancer. 2017; 141(4): 664–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30716
  26. Lei J., Ploner A., Elfström K.M., Wang J., Roth A., Fang F., et al. HPV vaccination and the risk of invasive cervical cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020; 383(14): 1340–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1917338
  27. Baldo V., Cocchio S., Gallo T., Furlan P., Romor P., Bertoncello C., et al. Pneumococcal conjugated vaccine reduces the high mortality for community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly: an Italian regional experience. PLoS One. 2016; 11(11): e0166637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166637
  28. Marques Antunes M., Duarte G.S., Brito D., Borges M., Costa J., Ferreira J.J., et al. Pneumococcal vaccination in adults at very high risk or with established cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J. Qual. Care Clin. Outcomes. 2021; 7(1): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa030
  29. Zhang J., Cheng Z., Ma Y., He C., Lu Y., Zhao Y., et al. Effectiveness of screening modalities in colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis. Clin. Colorectal Cancer. 2017; 16(4): 252–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa030
  30. Danese E., Montagnana M., Lippi G. Combining old and new strategies for colorectal cancer screening. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020; 8(4): 67. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.11.135
  31. Jansen E.E.L., Zielonke N., Gini A., Anttila A., Segnan N., Vokó Z. EU-TOPIA consortium. Effect of organised cervical cancer screening on cervical cancer mortality in Europe: a systematic review. Eur. J. Cancer. 2020; 127: 207–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.013
  32. WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention, second edition. Geneva; 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030824
  33. WHO. Screening programmes: a short guide. Increase effectiveness, maximize benefits and minimize harm. WHO/Europe: Copenhagen, 2020. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330829/9789289054782-eng.pdf
  34. Beauchamp K.A., Taber K.A., Muzzey D. Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of a 176-condition expanded carrier screen. Genet. Med. 2019; 21(9): 1948–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0455-8
  35. Ettehad D., Emdin C.A., Kiran A., Anderson S.G., Callender T., Emberson J., et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016; 387(10022): 957–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8
  36. Tsapas A., Avgerinos I., Karagiannis T., Malandris K., Manolopoulos A., Andreadis P., et al. Comparative effectiveness of glucose-lowering drugs for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020; 173(4): 278–86. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-0864
  37. Ponce O.J., Larrea-Mantilla L., Hemmingsen B., Serrano V., Rodriguez-Gutierrez R., Spencer-Bonilla G., et al. Lipid-lowering agents in older individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019; 104(5): 1585–94. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2019-00195
  38. Chaiyasothi T., Nathisuwan S., Dilokthornsakul P., Vathesatogkit P., Thakkinstian A., Reid C., et al. Effects of non-statin lipid-modifying agents on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among statin-treated patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 2019; 10: 547. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00547
  39. Ma T.T., Wong I.C.K., Man K.K.C., Chen Y., Crake T., Ozkor M.A., et al. Effect of evidence-based therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019; 14(1): e0210988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210988
  40. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021; 398(10304): 957–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1
  41. WHO. Technical package for cardiovascular disease management in primary health care: team-based care; 2019. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/260424
  42. Mills K.T., Obst K.M., Shen W., Molina S., Zhang H.J., He H., et al. Comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies for blood pressure control in hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018; 168(2): 110–20. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-1805
  43. Padwal R.S., Bienek A., McAlister F.A., Campbell N.R. Epidemiology of hypertension in Canada: An update. Can. J. Cardiol. 2016; 32(5): 687–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2015.07.734
  44. Johnson W., Onuma O., Owolabi M., Sachdev S. Stroke: a global response is needed. Bull. World Health Organ. 2016; 94(9): 634A. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.181636
  45. Gibson J. Multidisciplinary inpatient stroke unit care reduces death and dependency at discharge, with greatest benefits from care on a discrete stroke ward. Evid. Based Nurs. 2020; 24(4): 122. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2020-103315
  46. Rawson N.S.B. Leading causes of mortality and prescription drug coverage in Canada and New Zealand. Front. Public Health. 2020; 8: 544835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.544835
  47. Choudhry N.K., Avorn J., Glynn RJ, Antman E.M., Schneeweiss S., Toscano M., et al. Full coverage for preventive medi-cations after myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011; 365(22): 2088–97. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1107913
  48. Björklund E., Nielsen S.J., Hansson E.C.., Karlsson M., Wallinder A., Martinsson A., et al. Secondary prevention medications after coronary artery bypass grafting and long-term survival: a population-based longitudinal study from the SWEDEHEART registry. Eur. Heart J. 2020; 41(17): 1653–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz714
  49. Hackam D.G., Spence J.D. antiplatelet therapy in ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2019; 50(3): 773–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023954
  50. Mühlberger N., Schwarzer R., Lettmeier B., Sroczynski G., Zeuzem S., Siebert U. HCV-related burden of disease in Europe: a systematic assessment of incidence, prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9: 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-34
  51. Petta S., Maida M., Macaluso F.S., Barbara M., Licata A., Craxì A., et al. Hepatitis C virus infection is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Gastroenterology. 2016; 150(1): 145–55. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.007
  52. Kalidindi Y., Jung J., Feldman R., Riley T. 3rd. Association of direct-acting antiviral treatment with mortality among medicare beneficiaries with hepatitis C. JAMA Network Open. 2020; 3(7): e2011055. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11055
  53. Falade-Nwulia O., Suarez-Cuervo C., Nelson D.R., Fried M.W., Segal J.B., Sulkowski M.S. Oral direct-acting agent therapy for hepatitis C Virus infection: a systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 2017; 166(9): 637–48. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2575
  54. Jülicher P., Chulanov V.P., Pimenov N.N., Chirkova E., Yankina A., Galli C. Streamlining the screening cascade for active Hepatitis C in Russia: A cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS One. 2019; 14(7): e0219687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219687
  55. Poorolajal J., Hooshmand E., Mahjub H., Esmailnasab N., Jenabi E. Survival rate of AIDS disease and mortality in HIV-infected patients: a meta-analysis. Public Health. 2016; 139: 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.05.004
  56. Rodger A.J., Cambiano V. PARTNER Study Group. Risk of HIV transmission through condomless sex in serodifferent gay couples with the HIV-positive partner taking suppressive antiretroviral therapy (PARTNER): final results of a multicentre, prospective, observational study. Lancet. 2019; 393(10189): 2428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30418-0
  57. WHO. Preventing suicide: a global imperative. Geneva; 2014.
  58. RAND Corporation. Which behavioral interventions are most cost-effective in reducing drunk driving? 2015. Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9826.html
  59. Pitt T.M., Howard A.W., HubkaRao T., Hagel B.E. The effective-ness of booster seat use in motor vehicle collisions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2021; 159: 106296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106296
  60. Azami-Aghdash S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence in road traffic injury prevention: a scoping review of qualitative studies (2000 to 2019). Arch. Public Health. 2020; 78(1): 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-00493-0
  61. Yau R.K., Marshall S.W. Association between fire-safe cigarette legislation and residential fire deaths in the United States. Inj. Epidemiol. 2014; 1(1): 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-1714-1-10
  62. WHO. Preventing drowning: an implementation guide. Geneva; 2017. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/preventing-drowning-an-implementation-guide
  63. Gallet C.A., Doucouliagos H. The impact of healthcare spending on health outcomes: A meta-regression analysis. Soc. Sci. Med. 2017; 179: 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.024
  64. Budhdeo S., Watkins J., Atun R., Williams C., Zeltner T., Maruthappu M. Changes in government spending on healthcare and population mortality in the European Union, 1995–2010: a cross-sectional ecological study. J. R. Soc. Med. 2015; 108(12): 490–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076815600907

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2021 Kobyakova O.S., Starodubov V.I., Khaltourina D.A., Zykov V.A., Zubkova T.S., Zamiatnina E.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ:  ПИ № ФС77-50668 от 13.07.2012 г.