Production of methanol from СО2 on Cu-Zn-catalysts applied on commercial supports: impact of support and reaction conditions

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Catalytic properties of Cu-Zn-catalysts on various commercial supports such as Al2O3, SiO2, ZrO2(La), TiO2, ZnO, and activated carbon in the reaction of CO2 hydrogenation with methanol production are studied. The CuZn/Al2O3 catalyst is found to show the highest CO2 conversion; the highest selectivities to methanol equaling 99% and 97.5% are observed in CuZn/ZrO2(La) and CuZn/SiO2 catalysts, respectively, and high CH3OH selectivities of 90–95% are achieved in the temperature range of 175-275°C; and the CuZn/ZrO2(La) catalyst had the highest methanol productivity of 547 g/(kgcat h). The synthesized catalysts are characterized by methods of low-temperature nitrogen adsorption, X-ray phase analysis, and SEM-EDX.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

A. Batkin

N. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: kyst@list.ru
Ресей, Moscow, 119991

M. Tedeeva

M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: kyst@list.ru

Department of Chemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

K. Kalmykov

M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: kyst@list.ru

Department of Chemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

A. Leonov

M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: kyst@list.ru

Department of Chemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

N. Davshan

N. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: kyst@list.ru
Ресей, Moscow, 119991

P. Pribytkov

N. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences; M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Chemistry

Email: kyst@list.ru

M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Chemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119991; Moscow, 119991

S. Dunaev

M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Chemistry

Email: kyst@list.ru

Department of Chemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

I. Beletskaya

M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: kyst@list.ru

Department of Chemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

A. Kustov

N. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences; M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Chemistry

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: kyst@list.ru

M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Chemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119991; Moscow, 119991

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Bogdan V.I., Koklin A.E., Kustov A.L. et al. // Molecules. 2021. V. 26. P. 2883.
  2. Xin Q., Maximov A.L., Liu B.Y. et al. // Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2022. V. 95. P. 296.
  3. Evdokimenko N.D., Kapustin G.I., Tkachenko O.P. et al. // Molecules. 2022. V. 27. P. 1065.
  4. Matieva Z.M., Kolesnichenko N.V., Snatenkova Yu.M. et al. // J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2023. V. 147. P. 104929.
  5. Vikanova K.V., Kustov A.L., Makhov E.A. et al. // Fuel. 2023. V. 351. P. 128956.
  6. Saito M., Fujitani T., Takeuchi M. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 1996. V. 138. P. 311.
  7. Kurtz M., Wilmer H., Genger T. et al. // Catal. Lett. 2003. V. 86. P. 77.
  8. Ma J., Sun N., Zhang X. et al. // Catal. Today. 2009. V. 148. P. 221.
  9. Wang W., Wang S., Ma X. et al. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011. V. 40. P. 3703.
  10. Smirnova E.M., Evdokimenko N.D., Reshetina M.V. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2023. V. 97. P. 1395.
  11. Jiang Yi., Yang H., Gao P. et al. // J. CО2 Util. 2018. V. 26. P. 642.
  12. Dasireddy V.D.B.C., Likozar B. // Renew. Energ. 2019. V. 140. P. 452.
  13. Meunier N., Chauvy R., Mouhoubi S. et al. // Renew. Energ. 2020. V. 146. P. 1192.
  14. Fang X., Xi Y., Jia H. et al. // J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020. V. 88. P. 268.
  15. Atsbha T.A., Yoon T., Seongho P. et al. // J. CO2 Util. 2021. V. 44. P. 101413.
  16. Dement’ev K.I., Dementeva O.S., Ivantsov M.I. et al. // Pet. Chem. 2022. V. 62. P. 445.
  17. Schwiderowski P., Ruland H., Muhler M. // Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022. V. 38. P. 100688.
  18. Niu J., Liu H., Jin Ya. // Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022. V. 47. P. 9183.
  19. Ren M., Zhang Ya., Wang Xu. et al. // Catalysts. 2022. V. 12. P. 403.
  20. Kuznetsov N.Yu., Maximov A.L., Beletskaya I.P. // Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2023. V. 58. P. 1681.
  21. Kropp T., Paier J., Sauer J. // J. Catal. 2017. V. 352. P. 382.
  22. Gribovskii A., Ovchinnikova E., Vernikovskaya N. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2017. V. 308. P. 135.
  23. Losch P., Pinar A.B., Willinger M.G. et al. // J. Catal. 2017. V. 345. P. 11.
  24. Wang X., Li R., Bakhtiar S. ul H. et al. // Catal. Commun. 2018. V. 108. P. 64.
  25. Niu X., Gao J., Wang K. et al. // Fuel Process. Technol. 2017. V. 157. P. 99.
  26. Yang L., Liu Z., Liu Z. et al. // Chin. J. Catal. 2017. V. 38 (4). P. 683.
  27. Jiménez-López A., Jiménez-Morales I., Santamaría-González J. et al. // J. Mol. Catal. A. 2011. V. 335. P. 205.
  28. Pirola C., Manenti F., Galli F. et al. // Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014. V. 37. P. 553.
  29. Sun Q., Zhang Yu-L., Chen H.-Y. // J. Catal. 1997. V. 167. P. 92.
  30. Mierczynski P., Maniecki T.P., Chalupka K. et al. // Catal. Today. 2011. V. 176. P. 21.
  31. Ren H., Xu C.-H., Zhao H.-Ya. et al. // J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015. V. 28. P. 261.
  32. Bukhtiyarova M., Lunkenbein T., Kähler K. et al. // Catal. Lett. 2017. V. 147. P. 416.
  33. Zhang C., Yang H., Gao P. et al. // J. CО2 Util. 2017. V. 17. P. 263.
  34. Previtali D., Longhi M., Galli F. et al. // Fuel. 2020. V. 274. P. 117804.
  35. Vertepov A.E., Fedorova A.A., Batkin A.M. et al. // Catalysts. 2023. V. 13. P. 1231.
  36. Sloczynski J., Grabowski R., Kozlowska A. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2004. V. 278. P. 11.
  37. Bogdan V.I., Kustov L.M. // Mendeleev Commun. 2015. V. 25. P. 446.
  38. Evdokimenko N.D., Kim K.O., Kapustin G.I. et al. // Catal. Ind. 2018. V. 10. P. 288.
  39. Evdokimenko N.D., Kustov A.L., Kim K.O. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2018. V. 28. P. 147.
  40. Kim K.O., Evdokimenko N.D., Pribytkov P.V. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2021. V. 95. P. 2422.
  41. Kim K.O., Shesterkina A.A., Tedeeva M.A. et al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2023. V. 97. P. 582.
  42. Igonina M., Tedeeva M., Kalmykov K. et al. // Catalysts. 2023. V. 13. P. 906.
  43. Tedeeva M.A., Kustov A.L., Pribytkov P.V. et al. // Fuel. 2022. V. 313. P. 122698.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of CuZn/carrier catalysts.

Жүктеу (357KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Diffraction patterns of the samples of the Al2O3 support and CuZn/Al2O3 catalyst (a), the SiO2 support and CuZn/SiO2 catalyst (b), the TiO2 support and CuZn/TiO2 catalyst (c), the ZrO2(La) support and CuZn/ZrO2(La) catalyst (d), the C support and CuZn/C catalyst (e), the ZnO support and CuZn/ZnO catalyst (e), as well as data from the JCPDS database for crystalline CuO (JCPDS89–5895) and ZnO (JCPDS33783).

Жүктеу (374KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Micrographs of the catalyst samples

Жүктеу (929KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Maps of copper and zinc distribution

Жүктеу (964KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. X-ray microanalysis data of the catalyst surfaces of CuZn/Al2O3 (a), CuZn/SiO2 (b), CuZn/TiO2 (c), CuZn/ZrO2(La) (d), CuZn/C (d) and CuZn/ZnO (e).

Жүктеу (739KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 6. Dependences of CO2 conversion (a) and CH3OH selectivity (b) on the reaction temperature at P = 50 atm. for CuZn/carrier samples.

Жүктеу (458KB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 7. Dependence of selectivity for CH3OH on temperature for CuZn/SiO2 catalyst in the temperature range of 170–270°C at two different pressures of 40 and 50 atm.

Жүктеу (175KB)
Метадеректер
9. Fig. 8. Dependences of selectivity for CH4 (a) and CO (b) on reaction temperature at P = 50 atm. for CuZn/carrier samples.

Жүктеу (455KB)
Метадеректер
10. Fig. 9. Dependences of CH3OH productivity on reaction temperature at P = 50 atm. for CuZn/carrier samples.

Жүктеу (256KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025